Ford Sierra 1983 vs Audi 100 1986

 
Ford Sierra
1983 - 1987
Audi 100
1986 - 1987
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 105 HP116 HP
Torque: 157 NM172 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.8 seconds10.9 seconds
Ford Sierra engine produces 11 HP less power than Audi 100, whereas torque is 15 NM less than Audi 100. Despite less power, Ford Sierra reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.29.1
The Ford Sierra is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Ford Sierra consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi 100, which means that by driving the Ford Sierra over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres80 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 730 km in combined cycle870 km in combined cycle
Audi 100 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD)Front wheel drive (FWD)

Dimensions

Length: 4.49 m4.79 m
Width: 1.67 m1.81 m
Height: 1.39 m1.42 m
Ford Sierra is smaller.
Ford Sierra is 30 cm shorter than the Audi 100, 14 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Sierra is 3 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: no data644 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1920 litres
Turning diameter: 10 meters11.6 meters
The turning circle of the Ford Sierra is 1.6 metres less than that of the Audi 100, which means Ford Sierra can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`1501`840
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): no data1000
Pros and Cons: Ford Sierra has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better manoeuvrability
Audi 100 has
  • more power
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv