Ford Sierra 1984 vs Audi 100 1986

 
Ford Sierra
1984 - 1987
Audi 100
1986 - 1988
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.8 Petrol1.8 Petrol

Performance

Power: 90 HP88 HP
Torque: 140 NM142 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.3 seconds13 seconds
Ford Sierra is more dynamic to drive.
Ford Sierra engine produces 2 HP more power than Audi 100, but torque is 2 NM less than Audi 100. Thanks to more power Ford Sierra reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.57.9
The Audi 100 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Ford Sierra consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi 100, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Sierra could require 90 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres80 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 700 km in combined cycle1010 km in combined cycle
Audi 100 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD)Front wheel drive (FWD)

Dimensions

Length: 4.49 m4.79 m
Width: 1.67 m1.81 m
Height: 1.39 m1.42 m
Ford Sierra is smaller.
Ford Sierra is 30 cm shorter than the Audi 100, 14 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Sierra is 3 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: no data644 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1920 litres
Turning diameter: 10 meters11.6 meters
The turning circle of the Ford Sierra is 1.6 metres less than that of the Audi 100, which means Ford Sierra can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`0681`680
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): no data1000
Pros and Cons: Ford Sierra has
  • more dynamic
  • better manoeuvrability
Audi 100 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv