Ford Sierra 1984 vs Audi 100 1985

 
Ford Sierra
1984 - 1987
Audi 100
1985 - 1987
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.8 Petrol1.8 Petrol

Performance

Power: 90 HP90 HP
Torque: 140 NM138 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.3 seconds13.4 seconds
Ford Sierra is more dynamic to drive.
Ford Sierra and Audi 100 have the same engine power, but Ford Sierra torque is 2 NM more than Audi 100. Ford Sierra reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.59.0
The Ford Sierra is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Ford Sierra consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi 100, which means that by driving the Ford Sierra over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres80 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 700 km in combined cycle880 km in combined cycle
Audi 100 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD)4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive)

Audi 100 1982: This Audi has full-time Quattro I all-wheel drive with a free differential. It also has manually-locked, pneumatically activated rear and center differentials.

Dimensions

Length: 4.49 m4.79 m
Width: 1.67 m1.81 m
Height: 1.39 m1.42 m
Ford Sierra is smaller.
Ford Sierra is 30 cm shorter than the Audi 100, 14 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Sierra is 3 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: no data644 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1920 litres
Turning diameter: 10 meters11.5 meters
The turning circle of the Ford Sierra is 1.5 metres less than that of the Audi 100, which means Ford Sierra can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`0681`790
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): no data1000
Pros and Cons: Ford Sierra has
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better manoeuvrability
Audi 100 has
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • has 4x4 drive
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv