Ford Sierra 1984 vs Audi 100 1985
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 90 HP | 90 HP | |
Torque: | 140 NM | 138 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.3 seconds | 13.4 seconds | |
Ford Sierra is more dynamic to drive. Ford Sierra and Audi 100 have the same engine power, but Ford Sierra torque is 2 NM more than Audi 100. Ford Sierra reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 | 9.0 | |
The Ford Sierra is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Sierra consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi 100, which means that by driving the Ford Sierra over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 80 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 880 km in combined cycle | |
Audi 100 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Audi 100 1982: This Audi has full-time Quattro I all-wheel drive with a free differential. It also has manually-locked, pneumatically activated rear and center differentials. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.49 m | 4.79 m | |
Width: | 1.67 m | 1.81 m | |
Height: | 1.39 m | 1.42 m | |
Ford Sierra is smaller. Ford Sierra is 30 cm shorter than the Audi 100, 14 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Sierra is 3 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 644 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1920 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 11.5 meters | |
The turning circle of the Ford Sierra is 1.5 metres less than that of the Audi 100, which means Ford Sierra can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`068 | 1`790 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | no data | 1000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Ford Sierra has
|
Audi 100 has
| |