Ford Sierra 1983 vs Audi 100 1985
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 75 HP | 90 HP | |
Torque: | 123 NM | 138 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.7 seconds | 13.4 seconds | |
Audi 100 is a more dynamic driving. Ford Sierra engine produces 15 HP less power than Audi 100, whereas torque is 15 NM less than Audi 100. Due to the lower power, Ford Sierra reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.1 | 9.0 | |
The Ford Sierra is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Sierra consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi 100, which means that by driving the Ford Sierra over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 80 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 880 km in combined cycle | |
Audi 100 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Audi 100 1982: This Audi has full-time Quattro I all-wheel drive with a free differential. It also has manually-locked, pneumatically activated rear and center differentials. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.49 m | 4.79 m | |
Width: | 1.67 m | 1.81 m | |
Height: | 1.39 m | 1.42 m | |
Ford Sierra is smaller. Ford Sierra is 30 cm shorter than the Audi 100, 14 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Sierra is 3 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 644 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1920 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 11.5 meters | |
The turning circle of the Ford Sierra is 1.5 metres less than that of the Audi 100, which means Ford Sierra can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`065 | 1`790 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | no data | 1000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Ford Sierra has
|
Audi 100 has
| |