Ford Sierra 1982 vs Toyota Carina E 1992
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.3 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 114 HP | 133 HP | |
| Torque: | 176 NM | 183 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.6 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
|
Toyota Carina E is a more dynamic driving. Ford Sierra engine produces 19 HP less power than Toyota Carina E, whereas torque is 7 NM less than Toyota Carina E. Due to the lower power, Ford Sierra reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.1 | 7.9 | |
|
The Toyota Carina E is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Sierra consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Carina E, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Sierra could require 180 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
| Toyota Carina E gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.42 m | 4.53 m | |
| Width: | 1.67 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.36 m | 1.41 m | |
|
Ford Sierra is smaller. Ford Sierra is 11 cm shorter than the Toyota Carina E, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Sierra is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 470 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1250 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Sierra is 0.2 metres less than that of the Toyota Carina E. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`350 | 1`700 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Toyota Carina E has
| |