Ford Sierra 1982 vs Volkswagen Golf 1982
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.3 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 67 HP | 70 HP | |
| Torque: | 139 NM | 133 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 19.1 seconds | 13.5 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Golf is a more dynamic driving. Ford Sierra engine produces 3 HP less power than Volkswagen Golf, but torque is 6 NM more than Volkswagen Golf. Due to the lower power, Ford Sierra reaches 100 km/h speed 5.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 | 5.9 | |
|
The Volkswagen Golf is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Sierra consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Golf, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Sierra could require 120 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 40 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 890 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
| Ford Sierra gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Volkswagen Golf) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Ford Sierra) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.42 m | 3.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.67 m | 1.61 m | |
| Height: | 1.36 m | 1.41 m | |
|
Ford Sierra is larger, but lower. Ford Sierra is 60 cm longer than the Volkswagen Golf, 6 cm wider, while the height of Ford Sierra is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 370 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1102 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Sierra is 0.3 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Golf. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`162 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Sierra has
|
Volkswagen Golf has
| |