Ford Sierra 1982 vs Ford Sierra 1990
| Body: | Hatchback | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 2.3 Diesel | 1.8 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 67 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 139 NM | 152 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 19.1 seconds | 16.4 seconds | |
|
Ford Sierra 1990 is a more dynamic driving. Ford Sierra 1982 engine produces 8 HP less power than Ford Sierra 1990, whereas torque is 13 NM less than Ford Sierra 1990. Due to the lower power, Ford Sierra 1982 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 | 6.4 | |
| Ford Sierra 1982 consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Sierra 1990, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Sierra 1982 could require 45 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 890 km in combined cycle | 930 km in combined cycle | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.42 m | 4.47 m | |
| Width: | 1.67 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.36 m | 1.41 m | |
|
Ford Sierra 1982 is smaller. Ford Sierra 1982 is 5 cm shorter than the Ford Sierra 1990, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Sierra 1982 is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`162 | 1`150 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Sierra has
|
Ford Sierra has
| |