Ford Sierra 1986 vs Ford Sierra 1990
| Body: | Hatchback | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 HP | 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 NM | 171 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.6 seconds | 11.7 seconds | |
|
Ford Sierra 1990 is a more dynamic driving. Ford Sierra 1986 engine produces 4 HP less power than Ford Sierra 1990, whereas torque is 11 NM less than Ford Sierra 1990. Due to the lower power, Ford Sierra 1986 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.3 | 7.8 | |
|
The Ford Sierra 1990 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Sierra 1986 consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Sierra 1990, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Sierra 1986 could require 75 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| Ford Sierra 1990 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.42 m | 4.47 m | |
| Width: | 1.67 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.36 m | 1.41 m | |
|
Ford Sierra 1986 is smaller. Ford Sierra 1986 is 5 cm shorter than the Ford Sierra 1990, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Sierra 1986 is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`350 | 1`350 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Sierra has
|
Ford Sierra has
| |