Ford Sierra 1982 vs Ford Sierra 1990
| Body: | Hatchback | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 HP | 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 157 NM | 171 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.1 seconds | 11.7 seconds | |
|
Ford Sierra 1990 is a more dynamic driving. Ford Sierra 1982 engine produces 15 HP less power than Ford Sierra 1990, whereas torque is 14 NM less than Ford Sierra 1990. Due to the lower power, Ford Sierra 1982 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.1 | 7.8 | |
| Ford Sierra 1982 consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Sierra 1990, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Sierra 1982 could require 45 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.42 m | 4.47 m | |
| Width: | 1.67 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.36 m | 1.41 m | |
|
Ford Sierra 1982 is smaller. Ford Sierra 1982 is 5 cm shorter than the Ford Sierra 1990, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Sierra 1982 is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`250 | 1`350 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Sierra has
|
Ford Sierra has
| |