Ford Sierra 1982 vs Volkswagen Passat 1983
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 123 NM | 145 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.1 seconds | 11.5 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Passat is a more dynamic driving. Ford Sierra engine produces 15 HP less power than Volkswagen Passat, whereas torque is 22 NM less than Volkswagen Passat. Due to the lower power, Ford Sierra reaches 100 km/h speed 2.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.6 | 7.9 | |
| Ford Sierra consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Passat, which means that by driving the Ford Sierra over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 780 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.42 m | 4.84 m | |
| Width: | 1.67 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.36 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Ford Sierra is smaller. Ford Sierra is 42 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Passat, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Sierra is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 500 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Sierra is 0.8 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Passat, which means Ford Sierra can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`005 | 1`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Sierra has
|
Volkswagen Passat has
| |