Ford Sierra 1982 vs Toyota Carina E 1992
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 116 HP | |
| Torque: | 123 NM | 145 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.1 seconds | 11.3 seconds | |
|
Toyota Carina E is a more dynamic driving. Ford Sierra engine produces 41 HP less power than Toyota Carina E, whereas torque is 22 NM less than Toyota Carina E. Due to the lower power, Ford Sierra reaches 100 km/h speed 2.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.6 | 7.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.4 l/100km | 7.5 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Carina E is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford Sierra consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Carina E, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Sierra could require 75 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Sierra consumes 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Carina E. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 780 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
| 630 km with real consumption | 800 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota Carina E gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Toyota Carina E) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Ford Sierra) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.42 m | 4.53 m | |
| Width: | 1.67 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.36 m | 1.41 m | |
|
Ford Sierra is smaller. Ford Sierra is 11 cm shorter than the Toyota Carina E, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Sierra is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 470 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1250 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Sierra is 0.2 metres less than that of the Toyota Carina E. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`005 | 1`600 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Toyota Carina E has
| |