Ford Sierra 1982 vs Ford Sierra 1990
| Body: | Hatchback | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 60 HP | 71 HP | |
| Torque: | 98 NM | 119 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 18.1 seconds | 14.9 seconds | |
|
Ford Sierra 1990 is a more dynamic driving. Ford Sierra 1982 engine produces 11 HP less power than Ford Sierra 1990, whereas torque is 21 NM less than Ford Sierra 1990. Due to the lower power, Ford Sierra 1982 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.8 | 8.0 | |
| Ford Sierra 1982 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Sierra 1990, which means that by driving the Ford Sierra 1982 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.42 m | 4.47 m | |
| Width: | 1.67 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.36 m | 1.41 m | |
|
Ford Sierra 1982 is smaller. Ford Sierra 1982 is 5 cm shorter than the Ford Sierra 1990, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Sierra 1982 is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 353 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 997 | 800 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Sierra has
|
Ford Sierra has
| |