Ford Sierra 1989 vs Audi 100 1990
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.9 Petrol | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 146 HP | 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 229 NM | 265 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.7 seconds | 10.1 seconds | |
|
Ford Sierra is more dynamic to drive. Ford Sierra engine produces 26 HP more power than Audi 100, but torque is 36 NM less than Audi 100. Thanks to more power Ford Sierra reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.7 | 6.0 | |
|
The Audi 100 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Sierra consumes 5.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi 100, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Sierra could require 855 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 510 km in combined cycle | 1330 km in combined cycle | |
| Audi 100 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Audi 100 1990 2.5 engine: Reliable and robust engine, keep an eye on the cooling system and the timing belt change interval. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.51 m | 4.79 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Ford Sierra is smaller. Ford Sierra is 28 cm shorter than the Audi 100, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Sierra is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 644 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1920 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Sierra is 1.6 metres less than that of the Audi 100, which means Ford Sierra can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`350 | 1`910 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Sierra has
|
Audi 100 has
| |