Ford Sierra 1989 vs Subaru Outback 2017
Body: | Sedan | Estate car / wagon | |
---|---|---|---|
The wagon generally has more cargo space due to a larger trunk door opening, a roof that extends as far back as possible, and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into cargo space. Sedans tend to be quieter than wagons due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 120 HP | 175 HP | |
Torque: | 171 NM | 235 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 seconds | 10.2 seconds | |
Subaru Outback is a more dynamic driving. Ford Sierra engine produces 55 HP less power than Subaru Outback, whereas torque is 64 NM less than Subaru Outback. Due to the lower power, Ford Sierra reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.8 | 7.7 | |
Ford Sierra consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Subaru Outback, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Sierra could require 15 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.47 m | 4.82 m | |
Width: | 1.70 m | 1.84 m | |
Height: | 1.41 m | 1.68 m | |
Ford Sierra is smaller. Ford Sierra is 35 cm shorter than the Subaru Outback, 14 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Sierra is 27 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 512 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 11 meters | |
The turning circle of the Ford Sierra is 1 metres less than that of the Subaru Outback, which means Ford Sierra can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`350 | 2`100 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 1400 | 26 400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Ford Sierra has
|
Subaru Outback has
| |