Ford Sierra 1989 vs Audi 100 1988
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 116 HP | |
| Torque: | 171 NM | 172 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 seconds | 12.6 seconds | |
|
Ford Sierra is more dynamic to drive. Ford Sierra engine produces 4 HP more power than Audi 100, but torque is 1 NM less than Audi 100. Thanks to more power Ford Sierra reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.8 | 9.4 | |
|
The Ford Sierra is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Sierra consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi 100, which means that by driving the Ford Sierra over 15,000 km in a year you can save 240 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
| Audi 100 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.47 m | 4.79 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Ford Sierra is smaller. Ford Sierra is 32 cm shorter than the Audi 100, 11 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Sierra is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 570 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 610 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Sierra is 1.6 metres less than that of the Audi 100, which means Ford Sierra can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`350 | 1`800 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Sierra has
|
Audi 100 has
| |