Ford Sierra 1989 vs Ford Sierra 1990
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 105 HP | |
| Torque: | 171 NM | 166 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | 10.8 seconds | |
|
Ford Sierra 1989 is more dynamic to drive. Ford Sierra 1989 engine produces 15 HP more power than Ford Sierra 1990, whereas torque is 5 NM more than Ford Sierra 1990. Thanks to more power Ford Sierra 1989 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.8 | 7.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.6 l/100km | 9.4 l/100km | |
|
The Ford Sierra 1989 is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Ford Sierra 1989 consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Sierra 1990, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Sierra 1989 could require 45 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Ford Sierra 1989 consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Sierra 1990. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 690 km with real consumption | 630 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.47 m | 4.47 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.41 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Ford Sierra 1989 and Ford Sierra 1990 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`350 | 1`350 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Sierra has
|
Ford Sierra has
| |