Ford Sierra 1989 vs BMW 3 series 1998

 
Ford Sierra
1989 - 1990
BMW 3 series
1998 - 2000
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 120 HP150 HP
Torque: 171 NM190 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10 seconds9.9 seconds
Ford Sierra engine produces 30 HP less power than BMW 3 series, whereas torque is 19 NM less than BMW 3 series. Due to the lower power, Ford Sierra reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.88.9
Real fuel consumption: 8.6 l/100km9.5 l/100km
The Ford Sierra is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Ford Sierra consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series, which means that by driving the Ford Sierra over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Sierra consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series.
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres63 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 760 km in combined cycle700 km in combined cycle
690 km with real consumption660 km with real consumption
Ford Sierra gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.47 m4.47 m
Width: 1.70 m1.74 m
Height: 1.41 m1.42 m
Ford Sierra and BMW 3 series are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: no data440 litres
Turning diameter: 10 meters10 meters
Gross weight (kg): 1`3501`865
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
low
Average price (€): 14002000
Pros and Cons: Ford Sierra has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • lower price
BMW 3 sērija has
  • more power
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv