Ford Sierra 1987 vs Subaru Outback 2017
| Body: | Sedan | Estate car / wagon | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The wagon generally has more cargo space due to a larger trunk door opening, a roof that extends as far back as possible, and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into cargo space. Sedans tend to be quieter than wagons due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 HP | 175 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 NM | 235 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10.2 seconds | |
| Ford Sierra engine produces 59 HP less power than Subaru Outback, whereas torque is 75 NM less than Subaru Outback. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 7.7 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.47 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Ford Sierra is smaller. Ford Sierra is 35 cm shorter than the Subaru Outback, 14 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Sierra is 27 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 512 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Sierra is 1 metres less than that of the Subaru Outback, which means Ford Sierra can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`350 | 2`100 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 26 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Sierra has
|
Subaru Outback has
| |