Ford Sierra 1987 vs Audi 100 1988
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 101 HP | 116 HP | |
| Torque: | 148 NM | 172 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.4 seconds | 12.6 seconds | |
|
Audi 100 is a more dynamic driving. Ford Sierra engine produces 15 HP less power than Audi 100, whereas torque is 24 NM less than Audi 100. Due to the lower power, Ford Sierra reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.3 | 9.4 | |
| Ford Sierra consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi 100, which means that by driving the Ford Sierra over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 640 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
| Audi 100 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.47 m | 4.79 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Ford Sierra is smaller. Ford Sierra is 32 cm shorter than the Audi 100, 11 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Sierra is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 570 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 610 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Sierra is 1.6 metres less than that of the Audi 100, which means Ford Sierra can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`350 | 1`800 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Sierra has
|
Audi 100 has
| |