Ford Sierra 1987 vs Opel Omega 1989

 
Ford Sierra
1987 - 1989
Opel Omega
1989 - 1993
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 101 HP115 HP
Torque: 153 NM170 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.8 seconds11.5 seconds
Ford Sierra engine produces 14 HP less power than Opel Omega, whereas torque is 17 NM less than Opel Omega. Despite less power, Ford Sierra reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.58.8
Ford Sierra consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Omega, which means that by driving the Ford Sierra over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres75 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 700 km in combined cycle850 km in combined cycle
Opel Omega gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.47 m4.74 m
Width: 1.70 m1.76 m
Height: 1.41 m1.44 m
Ford Sierra is smaller.
Ford Sierra is 27 cm shorter than the Opel Omega, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Sierra is 3 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: no data520 litres
Turning diameter: 10 meters10.9 meters
The turning circle of the Ford Sierra is 0.9 metres less than that of the Opel Omega, which means Ford Sierra can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`350no data
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
below average
Average price (€): 14003000
Pros and Cons: Ford Sierra has
  • more dynamic
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Opel Omega has
  • more power
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv