Ford Sierra 1987 vs Subaru Outback 2017

 
Ford Sierra
1987 - 1989
Subaru Outback
2017 -
Body: SedanEstate car / wagon
The wagon generally has more cargo space due to a larger trunk door opening, a roof that extends as far back as possible, and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into cargo space. Sedans tend to be quieter than wagons due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: ManualAutomatic
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.5 Petrol

Performance

Power: 105 HP175 HP
Torque: 157 NM235 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.4 seconds10.2 seconds
Subaru Outback is a more dynamic driving.
Ford Sierra engine produces 70 HP less power than Subaru Outback, whereas torque is 78 NM less than Subaru Outback. Due to the lower power, Ford Sierra reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.17.7
Ford Sierra consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Subaru Outback, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Sierra could require 60 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres60 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 740 km in combined cycle770 km in combined cycle

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Dimensions

Length: 4.47 m4.82 m
Width: 1.70 m1.84 m
Height: 1.41 m1.68 m
Ford Sierra is smaller.
Ford Sierra is 35 cm shorter than the Subaru Outback, 14 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Sierra is 27 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: no data512 litres
Turning diameter: 10 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the Ford Sierra is 1 metres less than that of the Subaru Outback, which means Ford Sierra can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`3502`100
Safety: no data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 160025 800
Pros and Cons: Ford Sierra has
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Subaru Outback has
  • more power
  • has 4x4 drive
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv