Ford Sierra 1987 vs BMW 3 series 1998

 
Ford Sierra
1987 - 1989
BMW 3 series
1998 - 2000
Body: HatchbackSedan
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 101 HP150 HP
Torque: 148 NM190 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 13.4 seconds11 seconds
BMW 3 series is a more dynamic driving.
Ford Sierra engine produces 49 HP less power than BMW 3 series, whereas torque is 42 NM less than BMW 3 series. Due to the lower power, Ford Sierra reaches 100 km/h speed 2.4 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.310.0
The Ford Sierra is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Ford Sierra consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series, which means that by driving the Ford Sierra over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres63 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 640 km in combined cycle630 km in combined cycle

Dimensions

Length: 4.42 m4.47 m
Width: 1.69 m1.74 m
Height: 1.41 m1.42 m
Ford Sierra is smaller.
Ford Sierra is 5 cm shorter than the BMW 3 series, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Sierra is 1 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: no data440 litres
Turning diameter: 10 meters10 meters
Gross weight (kg): 1`3501`900
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
low
Average price (€): 18002000
Pros and Cons: Ford Sierra has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • lower price
BMW 3 sērija has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv