Ford Sierra 1987 vs Volkswagen Golf 1989
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 HP | 69 HP | |
| Torque: | 157 NM | 118 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.4 seconds | 14.1 seconds | |
|
Ford Sierra is more dynamic to drive. Ford Sierra engine produces 36 HP more power than Volkswagen Golf, whereas torque is 39 NM more than Volkswagen Golf. Thanks to more power Ford Sierra reaches 100 km/h speed 3.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.1 | 7.7 | |
| Ford Sierra consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Golf, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Sierra could require 60 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.42 m | 3.98 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Ford Sierra is larger, but slightly lower. Ford Sierra is 44 cm longer than the Volkswagen Golf, 3 cm wider, while the height of Ford Sierra is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 330 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1145 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Sierra is 0.5 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Golf, which means Ford Sierra can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`350 | 1`420 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Sierra has
|
Volkswagen Golf has
| |