Ford Sierra 1990 vs Opel Omega 1989
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 220 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 290 NM | 170 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.9 seconds | 11.5 seconds | |
|
Ford Sierra is more dynamic to drive. Ford Sierra engine produces 105 HP more power than Opel Omega, whereas torque is 120 NM more than Opel Omega. Thanks to more power Ford Sierra reaches 100 km/h speed 4.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.6 | 8.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 12.1 l/100km | 9.6 l/100km | |
|
The Opel Omega is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford Sierra consumes 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Omega, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Sierra could require 270 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Sierra consumes 2.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Omega. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 560 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
| 490 km with real consumption | 780 km with real consumption | ||
| Opel Omega gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.49 m | 4.74 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.38 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Ford Sierra is smaller. Ford Sierra is 25 cm shorter than the Opel Omega, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Sierra is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 520 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Sierra is 0.9 metres less than that of the Opel Omega, which means Ford Sierra can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`350 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Ford Sierra has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Opel Omega has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Ford Sierra, so Ford Sierra quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Sierra has
|
Opel Omega has
| |