Ford Sierra 1990 vs Audi 80 1991
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 HP | 116 HP | |
| Torque: | 166 NM | 165 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 seconds | 11.8 seconds | |
|
Ford Sierra is more dynamic to drive. Ford Sierra engine produces 11 HP less power than Audi 80, but torque is 1 NM more than Audi 80. Despite less power, Ford Sierra reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 8.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.4 l/100km | 8.9 l/100km | |
|
By specification Ford Sierra consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi 80, which means that by driving the Ford Sierra over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Ford Sierra consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi 80. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 66 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| 630 km with real consumption | 740 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.47 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.41 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Ford Sierra is 1 cm shorter than the Audi 80, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 710 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Sierra is 1.2 metres less than that of the Audi 80, which means Ford Sierra can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`350 | 1`690 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Audi 80 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Sierra has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Audi 80, so Audi 80 quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Sierra has
|
Audi 80 has
| |