Ford Sierra 1990 vs VAZ 2106 1982
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 HP | 64 HP | |
| Torque: | 166 NM | 92 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 seconds | 19 seconds | |
|
Ford Sierra is more dynamic to drive. Ford Sierra engine produces 41 HP more power than VAZ 2106, whereas torque is 74 NM more than VAZ 2106. Thanks to more power Ford Sierra reaches 100 km/h speed 8.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 10.5 | |
|
The Ford Sierra is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Sierra consumes 3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the VAZ 2106, which means that by driving the Ford Sierra over 15,000 km in a year you can save 450 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 39 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 370 km in combined cycle | |
| Ford Sierra gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.47 m | 4.17 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.61 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Ford Sierra is larger, but slightly lower. Ford Sierra is 30 cm longer than the VAZ 2106, 9 cm wider, while the height of Ford Sierra is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 345 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`350 | 1`435 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Sierra has
|
| |