Ford Sierra 1990 vs Opel Omega 1989
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Diesel | 2.3 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 73 HP | |
| Torque: | 152 NM | 138 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16.4 seconds | 19 seconds | |
|
Ford Sierra is more dynamic to drive. Ford Sierra engine produces 2 HP more power than Opel Omega, whereas torque is 14 NM more than Opel Omega. Thanks to more power Ford Sierra reaches 100 km/h speed 2.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 6.9 | |
|
The Ford Sierra is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Sierra consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Omega, which means that by driving the Ford Sierra over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 930 km in combined cycle | 1080 km in combined cycle | |
| Opel Omega gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.47 m | 4.74 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Ford Sierra is smaller. Ford Sierra is 27 cm shorter than the Opel Omega, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Sierra is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 520 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Sierra is 0.9 metres less than that of the Opel Omega, which means Ford Sierra can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`150 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Ford Sierra has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Opel Omega has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Ford Sierra, so Ford Sierra quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Sierra has
|
Opel Omega has
| |