Ford Sierra 1990 vs Volvo 940 1990
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 71 HP | 112 HP | |
| Torque: | 119 NM | 158 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.9 seconds | 13 seconds | |
|
Volvo 940 is a more dynamic driving. Ford Sierra engine produces 41 HP less power than Volvo 940, whereas torque is 39 NM less than Volvo 940. Due to the lower power, Ford Sierra reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.0 | 9.4 | |
|
The Ford Sierra is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Sierra consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo 940, which means that by driving the Ford Sierra over 15,000 km in a year you can save 210 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 790 km in combined cycle | |
| Volvo 940 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.47 m | 4.87 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.41 m | |
|
Ford Sierra is smaller. Ford Sierra is 40 cm shorter than the Volvo 940, 5 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 471 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 9.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Sierra is 0.1 metres more than that of the Volvo 940. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 800 | 1`865 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Sierra has
|
Volvo 940 has
| |