Ford Sierra 1990 vs BMW 3 series 1988

	Ford Sierra 1990 - 1991	BMW 3 series 1988 - 1991
Gearbox:	Manual	Manual
Engine:	1.6 Petrol	1.6 Petrol
Performance
Power:	71 HP	99 HP
Torque:	119 NM	141 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h:	14.9 seconds	12 seconds
	BMW 3 series is a more dynamic driving. Ford Sierra engine produces 28 HP less power than BMW 3 series, whereas torque is 22 NM less than BMW 3 series. Due to the lower power, Ford Sierra reaches 100 km/h speed 2.9 seconds later.
Fuel consumption
Fuel consumption (l/100km):	8.0	8.5
	The Ford Sierra is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Sierra consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series, which means that by driving the Ford Sierra over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity:	60 litres	55 litres
Full fuel tank distance:	750 km in combined cycle	640 km in combined cycle
	Ford Sierra gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions
Length:	4.47 m	4.32 m
Width:	1.70 m	1.64 m
Height:	1.41 m	1.38 m
	Ford Sierra is larger. Ford Sierra is 15 cm longer than the BMW 3 series, 6 cm wider, while the height of Ford Sierra is 3 cm higher.
Trunk capacity:	no data	425 litres
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down	no data	425 litres
Turning diameter:	10 meters	10 meters
Gross weight (kg):	800	1`545

Safety:	no data	no data
Quality:	below average	no data
Average price (€):	2000	4400
Pros and Cons:	Ford Sierra has lower fuel consumption more full fuel tank mileage lower price	BMW 3 sērija has more power more dynamic
Share these results to social networks or e-mail Facebook Twitter e-mail

Ford Sierra 1990 vs BMW 3 series 1988

Performance

Fuel consumption

Dimensions