Ford Sierra 1990 vs Opel Omega 1989
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 166 NM | 170 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 seconds | 12.5 seconds | |
| Ford Sierra engine produces 10 HP less power than Opel Omega, whereas torque is 4 NM less than Opel Omega. Despite less power, Ford Sierra reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 9.2 | |
|
The Ford Sierra is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Sierra consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Omega, which means that by driving the Ford Sierra over 15,000 km in a year you can save 255 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.51 m | 4.77 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Ford Sierra is smaller. Ford Sierra is 26 cm shorter than the Opel Omega, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Sierra is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 525 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1855 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Sierra is 0.9 metres less than that of the Opel Omega, which means Ford Sierra can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`350 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Ford Sierra has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Opel Omega has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Ford Sierra, so Ford Sierra quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Sierra has
|
Opel Omega has
| |