Ford Sierra 1990 vs Ford Scorpio 1992
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 HP | 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 166 NM | 171 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 seconds | 12 seconds | |
| Ford Sierra engine produces 15 HP less power than Ford Scorpio, whereas torque is 5 NM less than Ford Scorpio. Despite less power, Ford Sierra reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 8.1 | |
|
The Ford Sierra is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Sierra consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Scorpio, which means that by driving the Ford Sierra over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 860 km in combined cycle | |
| Ford Scorpio gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.51 m | 4.74 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.49 m | |
|
Ford Sierra is smaller. Ford Sierra is 23 cm shorter than the Ford Scorpio, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Sierra is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Sierra is 0.4 metres less than that of the Ford Scorpio, which means Ford Sierra can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`350 | 1`650 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Ford Scorpio has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Ford Sierra, so Ford Scorpio quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Sierra has
|
Ford Scorpio has
| |