Ford Sierra 1990 vs Opel Omega 1989
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 80 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 119 NM | 170 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.6 seconds | 12.5 seconds | |
|
Opel Omega is a more dynamic driving. Ford Sierra engine produces 35 HP less power than Opel Omega, whereas torque is 51 NM less than Opel Omega. Due to the lower power, Ford Sierra reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 | 9.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.5 l/100km | 9.4 l/100km | |
|
By specification Ford Sierra consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Omega, which means that by driving the Ford Sierra over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Ford Sierra consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Omega. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| 630 km with real consumption | 740 km with real consumption | ||
| Opel Omega gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.51 m | 4.77 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Ford Sierra is smaller. Ford Sierra is 26 cm shorter than the Opel Omega, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Sierra is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 525 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1855 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Sierra is 0.9 metres less than that of the Opel Omega, which means Ford Sierra can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`000 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Ford Sierra has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Opel Omega has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Ford Sierra, so Ford Sierra quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Sierra has
|
Opel Omega has
| |