Ford Sierra 1990 vs Opel Omega 1989
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 71 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 119 NM | 170 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.7 seconds | 12.5 seconds | |
|
Opel Omega is a more dynamic driving. Ford Sierra engine produces 44 HP less power than Opel Omega, whereas torque is 51 NM less than Opel Omega. Due to the lower power, Ford Sierra reaches 100 km/h speed 3.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.1 | 9.2 | |
|
The Ford Sierra is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Sierra consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Omega, which means that by driving the Ford Sierra over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.51 m | 4.77 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Ford Sierra is smaller. Ford Sierra is 26 cm shorter than the Opel Omega, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Sierra is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 525 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1855 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Sierra is 0.9 metres less than that of the Opel Omega, which means Ford Sierra can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 900 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Sierra has
|
Opel Omega has
| |