Ford Sierra 1990 vs BMW 3 series 1988
| Body: | Hatchback | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 71 HP | 99 HP | |
| Torque: | 119 NM | 141 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.9 seconds | 12 seconds | |
|
BMW 3 series is a more dynamic driving. Ford Sierra engine produces 28 HP less power than BMW 3 series, whereas torque is 22 NM less than BMW 3 series. Due to the lower power, Ford Sierra reaches 100 km/h speed 2.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.0 | 8.5 | |
|
The Ford Sierra is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Sierra consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series, which means that by driving the Ford Sierra over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 640 km in combined cycle | |
| Ford Sierra gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.42 m | 4.32 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.38 m | |
|
Ford Sierra is larger. Ford Sierra is 10 cm longer than the BMW 3 series, 5 cm wider, while the height of Ford Sierra is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 425 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 425 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 800 | 1`545 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 4400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Sierra has
|
BMW 3 sērija has
| |