Ford Sierra 1983 vs Audi 100 1982

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Ford Sierra
1983 - 1987
Audi 100
1982 - 1988
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD) / Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
Ford Sierra is available with front wheel drive and rear wheel drive, while Audi 100 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Ford Sierra also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs.
Engines: 1.6 - 2.81.8 - 2.3

Performance

Power: 67 - 150 HP69 - 165 HP
Torque: 123 - 216 NM123 - 240 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.2 - 20 seconds8.2 - 22.5 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.7 - 11.16.9 - 11.1
Ford Sierra petrol engines consumes on average 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than Audi 100. On average, Ford Sierra equipped with diesel engines consume 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi 100.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.49 m4.79 m
Width: 1.67 m1.81 m
Height: 1.39 m1.42 m
Ford Sierra is smaller.
Ford Sierra is 30 cm shorter than the Audi 100, 14 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Sierra is 3 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 1073 litres644 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1920 litres
Ford Sierra has more luggage capacity.
Even though the car is shorter, Ford Sierra has 429 litres more trunk space than the Audi 100. The Audi 100 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers.
Turning diameter: 10 meters11.6 meters
The turning circle of the Ford Sierra is 1.6 metres less than that of the Audi 100, which means Ford Sierra can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`232~ 1`806
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): no data1200
Pros and Cons: Ford Sierra has
  • also available in 2WD
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
  • better manoeuvrability
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv