Ford Sierra 1982 vs Ford Sierra 1990
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Hatchback | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ford Sierra 1982 is available with front wheel drive and rear wheel drive, while Ford Sierra 1990 can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Ford Sierra 1982 also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 1.3 - 2.8 | 1.6 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 60 - 150 HP | 71 - 220 HP | |
| Torque: | 98 - 216 NM | 119 - 290 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 - 19.1 seconds | 6.9 - 16.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 - 10.8 | 6.4 - 10.6 | |
|
Ford Sierra 1982 petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Ford Sierra 1990. On average, Ford Sierra 1982 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Sierra 1990. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.42 m | 4.47 m | |
| Width: | 1.67 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.36 m | 1.41 m | |
|
Ford Sierra 1982 is smaller. Ford Sierra 1982 is 5 cm shorter than the Ford Sierra 1990, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Sierra 1982 is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 353 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`217 | ~ 1`193 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Sierra has
|
Ford Sierra has
| |