Ford Sierra 1987 vs Audi 100 1988
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ford Sierra is available only with rear wheel drive, while Audi 100 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.3 | 1.8 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 67 - 204 HP | 69 - 165 HP | |
| Torque: | 119 - 276 NM | 123 - 265 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.5 - 19.1 seconds | 8 - 18.6 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 - 10.3 | 5.7 - 11.6 | |
|
Ford Sierra petrol engines consumes on average 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Audi 100. On average, Ford Sierra equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi 100. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.47 m | 4.79 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Ford Sierra is smaller. Ford Sierra is 32 cm shorter than the Audi 100, 11 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Sierra is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 570 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 610 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Sierra is 1.6 metres less than that of the Audi 100, which means Ford Sierra can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`232 | ~ 1`839 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Sierra has
|
Audi 100 has
| |