Ford Sierra 1987 vs Volkswagen Passat 1985
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Ford Sierra is available with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Volkswagen Passat can be equipped only with front wheel drive. | |||
Engines: | 1.6 - 2.9 | 1.3 - 2.2 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 67 - 150 HP | 54 - 136 HP | |
Torque: | 120 - 229 NM | 100 - 184 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.8 - 19.1 seconds | 9.5 - 25.2 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 - 11.6 | 6.0 - 10.3 | |
Ford Sierra petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen Passat. On average, Ford Sierra equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Passat. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.42 m | 4.42 m | |
Width: | 1.69 m | 1.71 m | |
Height: | 1.41 m | 1.38 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Ford Sierra and Volkswagen Passat are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Ford Sierra is 1 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Passat, which means Ford Sierra can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`257 | ~ 1`267 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 1800 | 1600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Ford Sierra has
|
Volkswagen Passat has
| |