Ford Sierra 1987 vs Fiat Croma 1986
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Ford Sierra is available with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Fiat Croma can be equipped only with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.9 | 1.9 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 67 - 150 HP | 75 - 155 HP | |
| Torque: | 119 - 229 NM | 162 - 247 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.8 - 19.1 seconds | 7.8 - 16.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 - 11.6 | 5.1 - 8.3 | |
|
Ford Sierra petrol engines consumes on average 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than Fiat Croma. On average, Ford Sierra equipped with diesel engines consume 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Croma. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.42 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.43 m | |
|
Ford Sierra is smaller. Ford Sierra is 8 cm shorter than the Fiat Croma, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Sierra is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`243 | ~ 1`245 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Sierra has
|
Fiat Croma has
| |