Ford S-Max 2007 vs Ford C-Max 2007
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.3 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 161 HP | 145 HP | |
| Torque: | 208 NM | 185 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
| Ford S-Max engine produces 16 HP more power than Ford C-Max, whereas torque is 23 NM more than Ford C-Max. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.5 | 8.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.1 l/100km | 9.3 l/100km | |
|
The Ford C-Max is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford S-Max consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford C-Max, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford S-Max could require 210 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford S-Max consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford C-Max. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 730 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 880 km on highway | ||
| 690 km with real consumption | 590 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford S-Max gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.77 m | 4.33 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.60 m | |
|
Ford S-Max is larger. Ford S-Max is 44 cm longer than the Ford C-Max, 3 cm wider, while the height of Ford S-Max is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 5 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 854 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 854 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2100 litres | 1620 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford S-Max (by 480 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford S-Max is 0.9 metres more than that of the Ford C-Max, which means Ford S-Max can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`340 | 1`930 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | high | |
| Ford C-Max has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford S-Max has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Ford C-Max, so Ford C-Max quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3600 | 2200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.9/10 | 4.8/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford S-Max has
|
Ford C-Max has
| |