Ford S-Max 2007 vs Ford Galaxy 2007
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 HP | 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.9 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
| Ford S-Max and Ford Galaxy have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Ford S-Max reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.3 | 7.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.0 l/100km | 8.7 l/100km | |
|
The Ford S-Max is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford S-Max consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Galaxy, which means that by driving the Ford S-Max over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford S-Max consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Galaxy. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 950 km in combined cycle | 940 km in combined cycle | |
| 870 km with real consumption | 800 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 560'000 km | 560'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 9 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.77 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.72 m | |
| Ford S-Max is 5 cm shorter than the Ford Galaxy, width is practically the same , while the height of Ford S-Max is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 854 litres | 390 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 854 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 390 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2100 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`505 | 2`505 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Ford S-Max has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Galaxy has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Ford S-Max, so Ford S-Max quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4000 | 4200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford S-Max has
|
Ford Galaxy has
| |