Ford S-Max 2007 vs Ford C-Max 2007
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 130 HP | 136 HP | |
Torque: | 320 NM | 320 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.9 seconds | 11.9 seconds | |
Ford S-Max engine produces 6 HP less power than Ford C-Max, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.3 | no data | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 55 litres | |
870 km with real consumption | 900 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.77 m | 4.37 m | |
Width: | 1.85 m | 1.82 m | |
Height: | 1.66 m | 1.60 m | |
Ford S-Max is larger. Ford S-Max is 40 cm longer than the Ford C-Max, 3 cm wider, while the height of Ford S-Max is 6 cm higher. | |||
Seats: | 7 seats | 5 seats | |
Trunk capacity: | 854 litres | 550 litres | |
Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 854 litres | no data | |
Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 550 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2100 litres | 1620 litres | |
The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford S-Max (by 480 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 10.7 meters | |
The turning circle of the Ford S-Max is 0.9 metres more than that of the Ford C-Max, which means Ford S-Max can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`505 | no data | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | below average | high | |
Ford C-Max has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford S-Max has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Ford C-Max, so Ford C-Max quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 4000 | 2800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
|
Ford C-Max has
| |