Ford S-Max 2006 vs Hyundai H1 2002
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 140 HP | 140 HP | |
Torque: | 320 NM | 314 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 seconds | 12.8 seconds | |
Ford S-Max is more dynamic to drive. Ford S-Max and Hyundai H1 have the same engine power, but Ford S-Max torque is 6 NM more than Hyundai H1. Ford S-Max reaches 100 km/h speed 2.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 8.7 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 7.1 l/100km | 9.3 l/100km | |
The Ford S-Max is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford S-Max consumes 2.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai H1, which means that by driving the Ford S-Max over 15,000 km in a year you can save 345 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford S-Max consumes 2.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai H1. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 65 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1090 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
1290 km on highway | 870 km on highway | ||
980 km with real consumption | 690 km with real consumption | ||
Ford S-Max gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Front-wheel drive cars (Ford S-Max) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Hyundai H1) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Ford S-Max 2006 2.0 engine: In early production engines, the camshaft timing chain often stretched, requiring timely replacement to avoid potential issues. The fuel system, equipped with piezo injectors, is highly sensitive to fuel ... More about Ford S-Max 2006 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.77 m | 4.70 m | |
Width: | 1.85 m | 1.82 m | |
Height: | 1.66 m | 1.88 m | |
Ford S-Max is larger, but lower. Ford S-Max is 8 cm longer than the Hyundai H1, 3 cm wider, while the height of Ford S-Max is 22 cm lower. | |||
Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
Trunk capacity: | 854 litres | 364 litres | |
Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 854 litres | no data | |
Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 364 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2100 litres | 3292 litres | |
The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Hyundai H1 (by 1192 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | no data | |
Gross weight (kg): | 2`505 | 2`800 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | average | no data | |
Average price (€): | 3600 | 2000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Ford S-Max has
|
Hyundai H1 has
| |