Ford S-Max 2006 vs Ford Galaxy 2006

 
Ford S-Max
2006 - 2010
Ford Galaxy
2006 - 2010
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 145 HP145 HP
Torque: 190 NM190 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.9 seconds11.2 seconds
Ford S-Max and Ford Galaxy have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Ford S-Max reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.18.2
Real fuel consumption: 9.4 l/100km8.9 l/100km
The Ford Galaxy is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise.
By specification Ford S-Max consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Galaxy, which means that by driving the Ford S-Max over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel.
But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Ford S-Max consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Galaxy.
Fuel tank capacity: 70 litres70 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 860 km in combined cycle850 km in combined cycle
740 km with real consumption780 km with real consumption

Dimensions

Length: 4.77 m4.82 m
Width: 1.85 m1.85 m
Height: 1.66 m1.72 m
Ford S-Max is 5 cm shorter than the Ford Galaxy, width is practically the same , while the height of Ford S-Max is 6 cm lower.
Seats: 7 seatsno data
Trunk capacity: 854 litres308 litres
Trunk capacity with 7 seats: 854 litresno data
Trunk capacity with 5 seats: no data308 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
2100 litresno data
Turning diameter: 11.6 metersno data
Gross weight (kg): 2`3401`100
Safety:
Quality:
below average

low
Ford S-Max has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Ford Galaxy has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Ford S-Max, so Ford S-Max quality is probably slightly better
Average price (€): 40004200
Pros and Cons: Ford S-Max has
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv