Ford S-Max 2006 vs Ford C-Max 2007
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 145 HP | 145 HP | |
Torque: | 190 NM | 185 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.9 seconds | 9.8 seconds | |
Ford S-Max and Ford C-Max have the same engine power, but Ford S-Max torque is 5 NM more than Ford C-Max. Ford S-Max reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.1 | 7.3 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 9.3 l/100km | 8.5 l/100km | |
The Ford C-Max is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford S-Max consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford C-Max, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford S-Max could require 120 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford S-Max consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford C-Max. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 55 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 860 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
1090 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
750 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
Ford S-Max gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.77 m | 4.33 m | |
Width: | 1.85 m | 1.82 m | |
Height: | 1.66 m | 1.60 m | |
Ford S-Max is larger. Ford S-Max is 44 cm longer than the Ford C-Max, 3 cm wider, while the height of Ford S-Max is 6 cm higher. | |||
Seats: | 7 seats | 5 seats | |
Trunk capacity: | 854 litres | 550 litres | |
Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 854 litres | no data | |
Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 550 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2100 litres | 1620 litres | |
The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford S-Max (by 480 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 10.7 meters | |
The turning circle of the Ford S-Max is 0.9 metres more than that of the Ford C-Max, which means Ford S-Max can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`340 | 1`925 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | below average | high | |
Ford C-Max has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford S-Max has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Ford C-Max, so Ford C-Max quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 3600 | 2200 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 7.9/10 | 4.8/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Ford S-Max has
|
Ford C-Max has
| |