Ford S-Max 2010 vs Ford C-Max 2014
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 200 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 420 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.6 seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
|
Ford S-Max is more dynamic to drive. Ford S-Max engine produces 50 HP more power than Ford C-Max, whereas torque is 20 NM more than Ford C-Max. Thanks to more power Ford S-Max reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 4.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.1 l/100km | 6.2 l/100km | |
|
The Ford C-Max is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford S-Max consumes 2.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford C-Max, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford S-Max could require 330 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford S-Max consumes 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford C-Max. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1060 km in combined cycle | 1360 km in combined cycle | |
| 1220 km on highway | 1500 km on highway | ||
| 860 km with real consumption | 960 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford C-Max gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.77 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.63 m | |
|
Ford S-Max is larger. Ford S-Max is 39 cm longer than the Ford C-Max, 6 cm wider, while the height of Ford S-Max is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 5 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 285 litres | 432 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 285 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 432 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2000 litres | 1684 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford S-Max (by 316 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford S-Max is 0.5 metres more than that of the Ford C-Max, which means Ford S-Max can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`505 | 2`050 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Ford S-Max scores higher in safety tests, but Ford C-Max is better rated in child safety tests. The Ford S-Max scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Ford C-Max has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford S-Max has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Ford C-Max, so Ford C-Max quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 7400 | 9600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford S-Max has
|
Ford C-Max has
| |