Ford S-Max 2010 vs Ford Galaxy 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.9 seconds | 10.9 seconds | |
| Ford S-Max engine produces 10 HP less power than Ford Galaxy, whereas torque is 30 NM less than Ford Galaxy. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 | 5.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.3 l/100km | 7.1 l/100km | |
|
The Ford Galaxy is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford S-Max consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Galaxy, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford S-Max could require 90 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford S-Max consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Galaxy. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 68 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1160 km in combined cycle | 1250 km in combined cycle | |
| 1340 km on highway | 1380 km on highway | ||
| 950 km with real consumption | 950 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford Galaxy gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Ford S-Max 2010 2.0 engine: In early production engines, the camshaft timing chain often stretched, requiring timely replacement to avoid potential issues. The fuel system, equipped with piezo injectors, is highly sensitive to fuel ... More about Ford S-Max 2010 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.77 m | 4.84 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.75 m | |
|
Ford S-Max is smaller. Ford S-Max is 7 cm shorter than the Ford Galaxy, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Ford S-Max is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 285 litres | 300 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 285 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 300 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2000 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`505 | 2`535 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Ford S-Max has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Galaxy has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Ford S-Max, so Ford S-Max quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 6800 | 14 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford S-Max has
|
Ford Galaxy has
| |