Ford S-Max 2010 vs Seat Alhambra 2010

 
Ford S-Max
2010 - 2015
Seat Alhambra
2010 - 2015
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.0 Diesel2.0 Diesel

Performance

Power: 140 HP140 HP
Torque: 320 NM320 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.9 seconds10.9 seconds
Ford S-Max and Seat Alhambra have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.05.7
Real fuel consumption: 7.3 l/100km7.3 l/100km
By specification Ford S-Max consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Alhambra, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford S-Max could require 45 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 70 litres70 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1160 km in combined cycle1220 km in combined cycle
1340 km on highway1400 km on highway
950 km with real consumption950 km with real consumption
Seat Alhambra gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.77 m4.85 m
Width: 1.88 m1.90 m
Height: 1.66 m1.72 m
Ford S-Max is smaller.
Ford S-Max is 8 cm shorter than the Seat Alhambra, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Ford S-Max is 6 cm lower.
Seats: 7 seatsno data
Trunk capacity: 285 litres267 litres
Trunk capacity with 7 seats: 285 litresno data
Trunk capacity with 5 seats: no data267 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
2000 litresno data
Turning diameter: 11.6 meters11.9 meters
The turning circle of the Ford S-Max is 0.3 metres less than that of the Seat Alhambra.
Gross weight (kg): 2`5052`370
Safety:
Ford S-Max is better rated in child safety tests.
Quality:
low

low
Ford S-Max has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Seat Alhambra has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Ford S-Max, so Ford S-Max quality is probably better
Average price (€): 720012 200
Pros and Cons: Ford S-Max has
  • higher children safety
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Seat Alhambra has
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv