Ford S-Max 2010 vs Ford C-Max 2014

 
Ford S-Max
2010 - 2015
Ford C-Max
2014 -
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.0 Diesel2.0 Diesel

Performance

Power: 140 HP170 HP
Torque: 320 NM400 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.9 seconds8.5 seconds
Ford C-Max is a more dynamic driving.
Ford S-Max engine produces 30 HP less power than Ford C-Max, whereas torque is 80 NM less than Ford C-Max. Due to the lower power, Ford S-Max reaches 100 km/h speed 2.4 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.04.8
Real fuel consumption: 7.3 l/100km7.1 l/100km
The Ford C-Max is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Ford S-Max consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford C-Max, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford S-Max could require 180 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford S-Max consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford C-Max.
Fuel tank capacity: 70 litres60 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1160 km in combined cycle1250 km in combined cycle
1340 km on highway1360 km on highway
950 km with real consumption840 km with real consumption

Dimensions

Length: 4.77 m4.38 m
Width: 1.88 m1.83 m
Height: 1.66 m1.63 m
Ford S-Max is larger.
Ford S-Max is 39 cm longer than the Ford C-Max, 6 cm wider, while the height of Ford S-Max is 3 cm higher.
Seats: 7 seats5 seats
Trunk capacity: 285 litres432 litres
Trunk capacity with 7 seats: 285 litresno data
Trunk capacity with 5 seats: no data432 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
2000 litres1684 litres
The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford S-Max (by 316 litres).
Turning diameter: 11.6 meters11.1 meters
The turning circle of the Ford S-Max is 0.5 metres more than that of the Ford C-Max, which means Ford S-Max can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 2`5052`050
Safety:
Ford S-Max scores higher in safety tests, but Ford C-Max is better rated in child safety tests. The Ford S-Max scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests.
Quality:
low

average
Ford C-Max has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Ford S-Max has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Ford C-Max, so Ford C-Max quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 74009800
Pros and Cons: Ford S-Max has
  • higher safety
  • better safety assist technologies
  • lower price
Ford C-Max has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • higher children safety
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv