Ford S-Max 2010 vs Ford C-Max 2014
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.9 seconds | 8.5 seconds | |
|
Ford C-Max is a more dynamic driving. Ford S-Max engine produces 30 HP less power than Ford C-Max, whereas torque is 80 NM less than Ford C-Max. Due to the lower power, Ford S-Max reaches 100 km/h speed 2.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 | 4.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.3 l/100km | 7.1 l/100km | |
|
The Ford C-Max is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford S-Max consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford C-Max, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford S-Max could require 180 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford S-Max consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford C-Max. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1160 km in combined cycle | 1250 km in combined cycle | |
| 1340 km on highway | 1360 km on highway | ||
| 950 km with real consumption | 840 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford S-Max 2010 2.0 engine: In early production engines, the camshaft timing chain often stretched, requiring timely replacement to avoid potential issues. The fuel system, equipped with piezo injectors, is highly sensitive to fuel ... More about Ford S-Max 2010 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.77 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.63 m | |
|
Ford S-Max is larger. Ford S-Max is 39 cm longer than the Ford C-Max, 6 cm wider, while the height of Ford S-Max is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 5 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 285 litres | 432 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 285 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 432 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2000 litres | 1684 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford S-Max (by 316 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford S-Max is 0.5 metres more than that of the Ford C-Max, which means Ford S-Max can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`505 | 2`050 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Ford S-Max scores higher in safety tests, but Ford C-Max is better rated in child safety tests. The Ford S-Max scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Ford C-Max has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford S-Max has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Ford C-Max, so Ford C-Max quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 6800 | 8200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford S-Max has
|
Ford C-Max has
| |