Ford S-Max 2010 vs Ford C-Max 2014
Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 145 HP | 185 HP | |
Torque: | 185 NM | n/a NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.9 seconds | n/a seconds | |
Ford S-Max engine produces 40 HP less power than Ford C-Max. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.2 | no data | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 55 litres | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.77 m | 4.38 m | |
Width: | 1.88 m | 1.83 m | |
Height: | 1.66 m | 1.63 m | |
Ford S-Max is larger. Ford S-Max is 39 cm longer than the Ford C-Max, 6 cm wider, while the height of Ford S-Max is 3 cm higher. | |||
Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
Trunk capacity: | 285 litres | 200 litres | |
Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 285 litres | no data | |
Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 200 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2000 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 10.9 meters | |
The turning circle of the Ford S-Max is 0.7 metres more than that of the Ford C-Max, which means Ford S-Max can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`340 | no data | |
Safety: | |||
Ford S-Max scores higher in safety tests, but Ford C-Max is better rated in child safety tests. The Ford S-Max scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
Quality: | low | average | |
Ford C-Max has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford S-Max has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Ford C-Max, so Ford C-Max quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 6800 | 8200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Ford S-Max has
|
Ford C-Max has
| |